Scientists call the theory an elaborate scheme designed to generate revenue for big government. Defining climate change as being “man-made” is a political hoax and science lie.
Adapted from Daniel Barker
The highly-politicized climate change debate rages on as we approach the crucial 2020 U.S. presidential election, despite an ever-growing body of evidence revealing the fact that the narrative of climate change being a man-made catastrophe is nothing more than an elaborate political hoax.
Recent campaign efforts to politicize the issue have been led by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, a proposal which could be the biggest single government expansion since the 1930s, masquerading as climate policy.
As reported by Forbes, a special report issued by the Polish Academy of Sciences PAN Committee of Geological Sciences, a major scientific institution in the European Union, agrees that the purported climate consensus argument is becoming increasingly untenable. It says, in part, that:
“Over the past 400 thousand years – even without human intervention – the level of CO2 in the air, based on the Antarctic ice cores, has already been similar four times, and even higher than the current value.“
It has become increasingly evident that the attitude of American youth has been leveraged by the political forces who control public education, and may prove to be a victory for the climate change community, according to experts who dare to challenge the spurious narrative.
Seemingly overnight, the young international activist Greta Thunberg has quickly gained a large American following, and her message has been exploited by political campaigns.
Thunberg recently spoke about the ‘Special Report on Global Warming,’ saying, “I don’t want you to listen to me. I want you to listen to the scientists and I want you to unite behind science. And then I want you to take real action.”
One of the experts who challenged the climate change narrative is Weather Channel founder John Coleman. Coleman warned that this campaign cycle could prove to be a “tipping point” in favor of people like Al Gore, who continue to amass vast fortunes based on the climate change scam.
In an previous interview with Climate Depot, Coleman said:
“Al Gore may emerge from the shadows to declare victory in the ‘global warming’ debate if [a Politician] like Hillary Clinton moves into the White House. Yes, if that happens and the new climate regulations become the law of the land, they will be next to impossible to overturn for four to eight years.”
Climate change proponents remain undeterred in their mission, ignoring numerous recent scientific findings indicating that there has been no warming trend at all for nearly two decades.
Al Gore’s dire predictions of the melting of polar ice on a massive scale have proved to be completely false. In fact, in 2014 – a year that was touted as being “the hottest ever” in the Earth’s history – there were record amounts of ice reported in Antarctica, an increase in Arctic ice, and record snowfalls across the globe.
UN Climate Scientist: ‘CO2 Emissions Are Making Earth Greener, More Fertile’
Carbon dioxide emissions are making the Earth greener and more fertile, a United Nations (UN) climate scientist has said.
In a paper for the Global Warming Policy Foundation, Dr Indur Goklany, who has previously represented the United States on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), says that the rising level of carbon dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere “is currently net beneficial for both humanity and the biosphere generally”.
The benefits are real, whereas the costs of warming are uncertain,” he adds.
“Carbon dioxide fertilises plants, and emissions from fossil fuels have already had a hugely beneficial effect on crops, increasing yields by at least 10-15 per cent,” Dr Golkany argues.
“This has not only been good for humankind but for the natural world too, because an acre of land that is not used for crops is an acre of land that is left for nature.”
Debunking the “97 percent” lie
On top of those “inconvenient truths,” the climate change community’s assertion that 97 percent of scientists agree that global warming is real has been completely debunked. Several independently-researched examinations of the literature used to support the “97 percent” statement found that the conclusions were cherry-picked and misleading.
More objective surveys have revealed that there is a far greater diversity of opinion among scientists than the global warming crowd would like for you to believe.
From the National Review:
“A 2008 survey by two German scientists, Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, found that a significant number of scientists were skeptical of the ability of existing global climate models to accurately predict global temperatures, precipitation, sea-level changes, or extreme weather events even over a decade; they were far more skeptical as the time horizon increased.”
Other mainstream news sources besides the National Review have also been courageous enough to speak out against the global warming propaganda – even the Wall Street Journalpublished an op-ed piece in 2015 challenging the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) pseudoscience being promulgated by global warming proponents.
And, of course, there are the more than 31,000 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative, and over 10,000 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields. But hey, Al Gore and his cronies have also ignored that inconvenient truth, as well.
Many of those scientists who signed the petition were likely encouraged to speak out in favor of the truth after retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist John L. Casey revealed that solar cycles are largely responsible for warming periods on Earth – not human activity.
Big government cronies continue getting richer from the climate change hoax
But the climate change crowd continues to push their agenda on the public while lining their pockets in the process. If you’re still inclined to believe what people like Al Gore has to say about climate change, please consider the fact that since he embarked on his crusade, his wealth has grown from $2 million in 2001 to $100 million in 2016 – largely due to investments in fake “green tech” companies and the effective embezzlement of numerous grants and loans.
You might want to take all of this information into serious consideration before casting your vote in the November election.
Sources:
Harrisburg100 